Current context
Inference reads the plant as it is rather than as it was when the export ran.
Machine learning close to the machines it serves.
Industrial AI reads measurements, equipment structure and history, and its output usually ends up as an instruction to a person or a controller.
A model that reads the plant as it is, and leaves its reasoning on the record.
The workload is the same retrieval-and-inference loop as any AI feature, with a different context: equipment identifiers, process windows and maintenance history. PLOMID keeps those in one layer so a model reads the operational truth, and every inference can be written back as a record.
A model that reads the plant as it is, and leaves its reasoning on the record.
The process
Windows of measurements and equipment state, live from the line.
Time series
The same shapes, held two ways. The difference is not the storage, it is where the agreement between them lives.
Every shape below is a surface of the layer, not a format to be converted into one. They are read and written together.
The models this workload names, the path a request takes through them, and the surfaces that speak to the layer.
The shape of the work itself.
The models this workload names.
One path from a request to the data it names.
How the workload reaches the layer.
Choose a stage to read what happens there, or a shape to see every stage that handles it. Nothing on the map is a private interface.
Observe
Process windows and equipment state
Time series
Process windows and equipment state
Equipment records and history attached
Models applied to the current context
The inference written back against the asset
Stated as properties of the system rather than as results we cannot measure for you.
Inference reads the plant as it is rather than as it was when the export ran.
A recommendation can be read against the measurements that produced it.
Equipment hierarchy and relationships are part of the context a model receives.
What operators did about an inference becomes data for the next one.
Industrial inference is only trusted if it is explainable. These are the parts that make it so.
Derived from the industry pages that reference this solution, so the two directions of the relationship always agree.